Southland Tales Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

RAMSEY CAMPBELL » Discussion » Southland Tales « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Weber_gregston (Weber_gregston)
Username: Weber_gregston

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 212.121.214.11
Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 06:04 pm:   

I found out why this bombed so badly. It sucks.

It's a big sprawling mess of a film with too many ideas and no coherency to the storyline. It doesn't have the visual flair of a David Lynch movie to carry it through on style points over substance and comes off as a huge disappointing farcical attempt at film-making.

With Donnie Darko he had all these ideas floating around but left them hovering under the surface to give a multi-layered involving story with several interpretations. With Southland Tales he's let the ideas take over any sense of coherency or character or story development. He wants only one interpretation so he's telling us evrything and that makes it wrong on two points - a) the ideas here are shit, and b) the ideas here are shit.

I know that that's technically the same point but it's such a biggie it deserved a second mention.

and c) we like as film watchers to be credited with the intelligence to interpret things our own way. We don't want things spelled out for us. (Well maybe Craig does with his templates)

I hate to say it but this is definitely one to avoid.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.10
Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 06:25 pm:   

I liked the bits I saw. I thought it had the mad sense of being dreamlike.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 79.187.206.46
Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 07:39 pm:   

Weber - I picked this up on Sunday, then put it down in favour of The Life Aquatic, We Own The Night, and because they were cheaper, even combined.

I'm still curious though, despite a rather succinct review.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Craig (Craig)
Username: Craig

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 75.4.245.27
Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 07:49 pm:   

I read the script a long while back, Weber... it had a strange frenetic energy to it... it was like an attempt to Tarrantino-ize Robert Altman... it even reminded me at the time, in odd and distant ways, of THE WATCHMEN (probably if I went back and revisited that comic, I'd realize how very, very off I was, but...). The script was a mess, all over the place, but - it's very strange, it was bad, but PRO-bad... for all I can't stand this guy, he wrote a script that failed on a higher level: it was wild and energetic, and disgustingly "pretentious" (yes, pretentious, I'm using pretentious to describe it), but... gotta admit, there was a certain something to it, that separated it from the pack... though has yet never been able to crest my inactive-desire to actually rent and see it....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.10
Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 08:15 pm:   

I think I must have tuned into its madness because i liked the bits I saw very much. I think the pretentiousness was meant to be part of it, if that makes sense - it suited the material. And really, anything with ideas is sort of always better than something with none.

Life Aquatic was one of the dullest dvd experiences I've had in recent years.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.242.126
Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 09:13 pm:   

Life Aquatic was one of the dullest dvd experiences I've had in recent years.

Ha! Boring, wasn't it, Tone?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.10
Posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 - 10:53 pm:   

It was less affecting than just looking at a series of stills. In fact, it was un-unaffecting, as if someone were setting out to make something that would make you feel hollow. Odd, really.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.159.152.164
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 12:33 am:   

I didn't mind LIFE AQUATIC - at least I reached the end, which is more than I did with SOUTHLAND TALES.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 79.187.206.46
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 08:01 am:   

Philistines. The Life Aquatic, boring????? So, I shudder to think what you made of The Royal Tennbaums? That was addressed to Tony/Zed.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 213.219.8.243
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 01:53 pm:   

The Royal Tennenbaums was ok: vastly overrated. To be honest, I recall very little about the film other than the fact I reasonably enjoyed it. Nowt flash, as they say in my part of the world.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 213.219.8.243
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 01:54 pm:   

The Life Equatic = trendy film people pretend to like.

Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.159.152.164
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 03:46 pm:   

The Life Equatic = trendy film people pretend to like.

Hah! You're just saying that 'cos your attention span has plummeted since you started having those Sugar Frosted Chocolate Bombs for breakfast!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.10
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 03:51 pm:   

I watched it just feeling absolutely nothing, that it was an experiment. Kind of like Andy Warhol art - defying feeling.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Craig (Craig)
Username: Craig

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 75.4.244.175
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 05:07 pm:   

I enjoyed THE DARJEELING LIMITED when I saw it... but have only just remembered it, half a year later, by this thread....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 79.187.206.46
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 05:15 pm:   

Zed - stop with the class warrior stuff, mate. We both hail from the same background.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Weber_gregston (Weber_gregston)
Username: Weber_gregston

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 212.121.214.11
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 05:38 pm:   

I agree with Zed on the Tenenbaums, Life Aquatic never appealed to me. Zed sums it up with his acerbic little jape earlier.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel (Joel)
Username: Joel

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 217.37.199.45
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 06:52 pm:   

The Life Aquatic being the film about a Jacques Cousteau wannabe? If so, I really liked it: a bittersweet, painful portrait of professional and personal failure, and a tribute to a bygone era of natural history TV. It gained more poignancy with the death of Steve Irwin. The final scene is quite breathtaking. Maybe you have to be middle-aged to get it.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 06:54 pm:   

Maybe I just need to watch it all the way through! I dunno - if only I was FEELING anything.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel (Joel)
Username: Joel

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 217.37.199.45
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 06:57 pm:   

Tony, I saw it being rather like a film with Ed Wood encountering real aliens. Bleak comedy, irritation, sadness and finally awe.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 07:04 pm:   

I'll give it another whirl. It's happened too often, me not 'getting' a film first time.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 79.187.206.46
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 07:45 pm:   

Tony - Oh, so Joel says it's worth the watch, but when little old Frank says the same thing....

Joel - if there's ever a war, I got yer back comrade.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.242.126
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 09:38 pm:   

Like Tony, I never made it all the way through. It bored me - something I simply won't stand from a film. And I usually love Bill Murray (have done ever since STRIPES, back in the 80s).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 - 10:11 pm:   

Probably because Joel didn't start with the word 'Phillistines'!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Protodroid (Protodroid)
Username: Protodroid

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.152.211.38
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:39 am:   

Which director said "there are no rules in film, only sins, and the worst sin is to be boring"?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:42 am:   

Paul Schrader?
No - he said an audience would rather be confused than bored, didn't he...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:43 am:   

Jeremy Thomas.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:44 am:   

Gerald! Gerald Thomas!
Oh, balls.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Protodroid (Protodroid)
Username: Protodroid

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.152.211.38
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:54 am:   

No, it's an older director.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Bestwick (Simon_b)
Username: Simon_b

Registered: 10-2008
Posted From: 86.24.165.182
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:58 am:   

Billy Wilder? He coined the Eleventh Commandment, anyway: 'Thou shalt not bore.'
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:58 am:   

I was sort of joking, naming a Carry on director... :-(

John Ford? Hitch?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 12:59 am:   

Thing is, which director ever thought it a good idea to bore the audience? Apart from Andy Warhol, that is, or that Life Aquatic guy...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Protodroid (Protodroid)
Username: Protodroid

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.152.211.38
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 01:03 am:   

Sorry, I didn't know who directed those. God, there's absolutely NOTHING to redeem those films, is there? Even behind the scenes, there's only alcoholism and suicide. If I could go back in time, I'd destroy the Carry On series, for the good of Britain. Bad Britain! Now don't do that again.

Oh yeah, I think it was Billy Wilder.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Bestwick (Simon_b)
Username: Simon_b

Registered: 10-2008
Posted From: 86.24.165.182
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 01:03 am:   

At a guess, Tony, whichever twunt was answerable for Exorcist II.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Protodroid (Protodroid)
Username: Protodroid

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.152.211.38
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 01:07 am:   

Wash your nethers out with soap! That was the (once) great John Boorman.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Simon Bestwick (Simon_b)
Username: Simon_b

Registered: 10-2008
Posted From: 86.24.165.182
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 01:10 am:   

Egad, Proto, you're right. Forgotten. What the hell was he thinking when he inflicted that heap of shite on the world? Ah well- he did give us DELIVERANCE, EXCALIBUR and POINT BLANK so I'll forgive him. I can only assume he had a bad coke habit or something at the time.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.159.152.164
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 01:10 am:   

Nooo! CARRY ON SCREAMING!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Protodroid (Protodroid)
Username: Protodroid

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.152.211.38
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 01:16 am:   

What about the one Kenneth Williams wrote? Carry on Wanking Bitterly in a Empty Room under a Naked Lightbulb?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 09:31 am:   

Hey! I LIKE Exorcist II!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 09:32 am:   

Kenneth Williams - what a misery. Stuck in his own mud and moaning about it. Maybe if he'd had his piles done he would have been happier.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.161.253.208
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 09:41 am:   

Comparee with Vincent Price, stuck in a type, but having fun with it. And it showed.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 79.187.206.46
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 07:41 pm:   

Philistines.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 79.187.206.46
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 07:51 pm:   

Tony - are you saying if I hadn't began with 'philistines' you're answer would have been different. Strange. Relax, I was only gently prodding.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.170.88.98
Posted on Thursday, January 15, 2009 - 08:20 pm:   

I know! I was joking too, though probably with a grain of truth...

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration