Author |
Message |
   
Kate (Kathleen)
Username: Kathleen
Registered: 09-2009 Posted From: 213.122.209.76
| Posted on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 - 06:27 pm: | |
There's a groovy house on the market if you are: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/us_and_canada/10154402.stm |
   
Hubert (Hubert) Username: Hubert
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 78.22.230.214
| Posted on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 - 06:32 pm: | |
Wish I could afford it  |
   
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 88.111.142.82
| Posted on Tuesday, May 25, 2010 - 06:33 pm: | |
I could do with a change of scenery. |
   
Craig (Craig) Username: Craig
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 75.4.235.232
| Posted on Wednesday, May 26, 2010 - 01:00 am: | |
Do you realize, that whoever buys it... possesses it?...  |
   
Barbara Roden (Nebuly)
Username: Nebuly
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 142.179.22.63
| Posted on Wednesday, May 26, 2010 - 05:48 am: | |
Or the house possesses them. . . . |
   
Paul_finch (Paul_finch) Username: Paul_finch
Registered: 11-2009 Posted From: 195.93.21.74
| Posted on Wednesday, May 26, 2010 - 10:37 am: | |
A pretty good documentary on it was screened over here quite recently, featuring all the latest developments. Not every claim was debunked, but it's now pretty evident that the original 'facts' are lost in layers of deceit and counter-deceit. Even the lawyer who was the first one to go public that it was a big money-making hoax was accused of being a shady character who was trying to scupper the deal because he'd been cut out of it. All that said, the now infamous 'demon child' photograph, which of course was taken by paranormal investigators long after the 'Lutz' family had vacated the property, is still very spooky - and no explanation has been offered for it. |