Amicus or Hammer? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

RAMSEY CAMPBELL » Discussion » Amicus or Hammer? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Matthew Fryer (Matthew_fryer)
Username: Matthew_fryer

Registered: 08-2009
Posted From: 90.202.180.87
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 03:07 pm:   

When it comes to a bit of old-school British horror, do you prefer the more contemporary narrated anthologies of Amicus, or the saucy period gothic of Hammer?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 85.222.86.21
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 03:17 pm:   

That's a difficult question. I think push come to shove, Amicus wins out, but only just. I love Hammer, but find all the 'sauciness' an unwanted distraction from the story.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stevie Walsh (Stephenw)
Username: Stephenw

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 82.17.252.126
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 04:54 pm:   

Amicus always made the nastier, more gritty and gruesome horror films but overall the Hammers were of a higher cinematic quality, better acted and more stylish imo - they were also far more prolific and varied in the subject matter they tackled e.g. 'Quatermass And The Pit', 'One Million Years BC', 'Captain Clegg', 'The Anniversary', 'Paranoiac', etc...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.253.77
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 06:21 pm:   

Amicus for me - the contemporary settings and gritty feel sucked me right in. Always loved Hammer, of course, just not as much as Amicus.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.253.77
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 06:22 pm:   

but find all the 'sauciness' an unwanted distraction from the story.

Not for me...the sauciness was always very much wanted.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gary Fry (Gary_fry)
Username: Gary_fry

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.31.244.154
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 07:13 pm:   

Yeah, boobies are pretty much essential.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.177.115.63
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 07:41 pm:   

Amicus for me if we're only looking at Hammer's 'period costume' stuff, but if we're looking at the entire (good!) Hammer output, then the latter wins easily.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Forth (John)
Username: John

Registered: 05-2008
Posted From: 82.24.1.217
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 08:06 pm:   

The quality to quantity ratio is probably in Amicus' favour, but when it comes to personal favourites films like THE DEVIL RIDES OUT, QUATERMASS AND THE PIT and THE NANNY win it for Hammer for me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Carolinec (Carolinec)
Username: Carolinec

Registered: 06-2009
Posted From: 82.38.75.85
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 08:23 pm:   

I couldn't possibly choose between the two - it depends on the mood I'm in, I guess. Basically, they were both great examples of the absolute pinnacle of British horror cinema as far as I'm concerned.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Llewellyn Probert (John_l_probert)
Username: John_l_probert

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.152.74.159
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 08:31 pm:   

Amicus for me (that's hardly surprising, is it?) not just because of the contemporary settings but because the anthology movies meant that every story got to run its natural length.

Oddly enough I quite liked the lack of nudity in the Amicus films (Shock! Horror!) because British 70s Horror never did sex very well anyway and in the Hammers the breasts always felt shoehorned in out of necessity.

Now there's an image
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Carolinec (Carolinec)
Username: Carolinec

Registered: 06-2009
Posted From: 82.38.75.85
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 08:35 pm:   

>> .. and in the Hammers the breasts always felt shoehorned in out of necessity.<<

You've just made me nearly choke with laughter, Lord P!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Llewellyn Probert (John_l_probert)
Username: John_l_probert

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.152.74.159
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 09:03 pm:   

Thank you Caroline!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Seanmcd (Seanmcd)
Username: Seanmcd

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 217.39.90.148
Posted on Saturday, September 25, 2010 - 09:39 pm:   

Hammer for me. Three names: Cushing, Lee and Fisher. Always entertaining when working separately and bloody brilliant when two of them teamed up. But when this unholy trinity combined the result was spellbinding.
The Curse of Frankenstein.
Dracula.
The Hound of the Baskervilles.
The Mummy.
The Gorgon.
Night of the Big Heat (Non Hammer)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ramsey Campbell (Ramsey)
Username: Ramsey

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 195.93.21.68
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 10:50 am:   

Well, quite a few Hammer films were contemporary, though - the Quatermass films, X The Unknown, Taste of Fear, The Damned, The Nanny... Those and films such as the original Hammer Dracula swing it for me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 85.222.86.21
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 10:54 am:   

I still prefer Amicus, but if I had to choose my favourite film from either company, it'd be Quatermass and the Pit every time.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Johnny_mains (Johnny_mains)
Username: Johnny_mains

Registered: 04-2010
Posted From: 82.22.75.99
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 12:06 pm:   

It's a shame that TYBURN didn't have a chance to spread their wings as a production company. THE GHOUL, PERSECUTION and the LEGENDS OF THE WEREWOLF are at heart Hammer films made on the cheap - but I think THE GHOUL is still an outstanding film. Just a shame that Hammer milked the well dry and there just wasn't an appetite for this very British type of horror.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Bacon (Stevebacon)
Username: Stevebacon

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 93.186.20.138
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 12:17 pm:   

That's like chosing your favourite child. So for me it's probably Amicus. Because of the portmanteau.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.253.77
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 03:17 pm:   

I agree: The Ghoul is excellent, and I also have a soft spot for Legend of the Werewolf - the ending in the sewers, the autopsy bits. Really good stuff.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stevie Walsh (Stephenw)
Username: Stephenw

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 82.17.252.126
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 03:51 pm:   

'The Ghoul' has long been one of my favourite 70s horror films and I could never understand the slating it always got from the critics!? The grand guignol atmospherics have rarely been done better on screen and the cast was just sublime; Peter Cushing, John Hurt (who steals the film), Gwen Watford & Don Henderson made one of the most memorable band of nasties ever assembled on screen imo, while what's not to like about any film that has Veronica Carlson AND Alexandra Bastedo (reason enough to have 'The Champions' box set!) as the screaming totty... and never forgetting good old Ian McCulloch, in yet another genre classic!

I haven't seen this in years, wonder is it available on DVD?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gary Fry (Gary_fry)
Username: Gary_fry

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.31.244.154
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 03:52 pm:   

I think both Hammer and Amicus were rubbish.

[ducks for cover]
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.253.77
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 04:25 pm:   

Stevie - I'm with you all the way regarding The Ghoul. Hurt is just brilliant. The film genuinely scared me when I first saw it - that brilliant opening with the fauz hanging, and the intense ending on the upper landing. Lovely stuff, and one of my personal favourite Brit horror films, too.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.253.77
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 04:25 pm:   

"fauz" What am I on? I meant faux, of course...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Craig (Craig)
Username: Craig

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 75.4.245.39
Posted on Sunday, September 26, 2010 - 05:53 pm:   

I agree with Ramsey - when Hammer was good, it was sublime. And the inestimable QUATERMASS AND THE PIT, plus the iconic HORROR OF DRACULA, and the crazed FRANKENSTEIN AND THE MONSTER FROM HELL (which gave us [imho, and contra Wikipedia] Mr. Burns from "The Simpsons")... these and others, outweigh Amicus any day of the week....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Seanmcd (Seanmcd)
Username: Seanmcd

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 217.39.90.148
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 12:58 am:   

Reminds me, I must upload my photos of Stevie and myself visiting the Excelsior Picture Theatre out in the countryside near Belfast for a 'Hammer Horror Double Bill' of 'The Mummy' and 'The Man who could Cheat Death'.

The Excelsior Picture Theatre is a labour of love for it's proprietor Roy Spence. He has built a fully functioning mini art deco picture theatre IN HIS GARAGE! Obviously it only holds about 15/20 but this just adds to the charm. It has fully tiered plush seating, a working curtain and a proper little box office. The walls are covered in those old 50's B movie posters and coming soon ads. Going to the loo I passed several fully painted Universal/Aurora monster model kits. For memorabilia alone the place was worth a fortune. When the intermission came the ice lollies were passed around! An utterly magical nostalgic experience.

Roy Spence has a twin brother, Noel, who also built and runs 'The Tudor' picture theatre 2 mins down the lane. Now there's a proper hobby!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stevie Walsh (Stephenw)
Username: Stephenw

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 82.17.252.126
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 03:07 am:   

It was a memorable night, Sean!

Talking of Hammer/Amicus movies here are my Top 20 taken from just those two studios:

1. 'The Devil Rides Out' (1968) by Terence Fisher - HAMMER
2. 'Quatermass And The Pit' (1967) by Roy Ward Baker - HAMMER
3. 'From Beyond The Grave' (1973) by Kevin Connor - AMICUS
4. 'To The Devil A Daughter' (1976) by Peter Sykes - HAMMER
5. 'Dracula, Prince Of Darkness' (1966) by Terence Fisher - HAMMER
6. 'Plague Of The Zombies' (1966) by John Gilling - HAMMER
7. 'The Damned' (1963) by Joseph Losey - HAMMER
8. 'The Curse Of Frankenstein' (1957) by Terence Fisher - HAMMER
9. 'Torture Garden' (1967) by Freddie Francis - AMICUS
10. 'Dr Terror's House Of Horrors' (1964) by Freddie Francis - AMICUS
11. 'Dracula' (1958) by Terence Fisher - HAMMER
12. 'The Quatermass Experiment' (1955) by Val Guest - HAMMER
13. 'The Hound Of The Baskervilles' (1959) by Terence Fisher - HAMMER
14. 'Asylum' (1972) by Roy Ward Baker - AMICUS
15. 'Curse Of The Werewolf' (1961) by Terence Fisher - HAMMER
16. 'Quatermass II' (1957) by Val Guest - HAMMER
17. 'The House That Dripped Blood' (1971) by Peter Duffell - AMICUS
18. 'The Witches' (1966) by Cyril Frankel - HAMMER
19. 'Tales From The Crypt' (1972) by Freddie Francis - AMICUS
20. 'Vault Of Horror' (1973) by Roy Ward Baker - AMICUS

Hammer win easily, while Amicus excelled at the portmanteau format the rest of their output was pretty routine imho... 'The Deadly Bees' anyone?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Huw (Huw)
Username: Huw

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 61.216.44.124
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 08:50 am:   

Both Hammer and Amicus made some great films, but Hammer just edges it for me. I don't think Amicus made anything that can quite match up to Quatermass and the Pit, for example. But, then again, those portmanteau films are great fun... I really wouldn't want to be without the best of either studio's output.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 195.166.117.210
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 11:20 am:   

I really wouldn't want to be without the best of either studio's output

I think that sums it up perfectly, Huw.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Paul_finch (Paul_finch)
Username: Paul_finch

Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 92.21.138.176
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 11:32 am:   

This is a great debate.

As others have said, when Hammer were at their best, they really were something special - the early stuff in particular: CURSE OF FRANKENSTEIN, PHANTOM OF THE OPERA, CURSE OF THE WEREWOLF, QUATERMASS AND THE PIT. Of course, later on, in the raunchy 1970s, they often got diverted into producing movies that were little more than titillation exercises for juvenile male audiences (with long hair, star jumpers and crap flares). Efforts like THE VAMPIRE LOVERS and LUST FOR A VAMPIRE were little more than 'Confessions' versions of Hammer's earlier output. Though they were still capable of raising their game, even late on - HANDS OF THE RIPPER, for example. In this respect, I think that in the 1970s the Amicus portmanteau movies were a more satisfying experience for true horror buffs (rather than the sort of people who'd think that, if there was no horror available, a good night out was going to see HOLIDAY ON THE BUSES, which was also a Hammer film I shudder to admit). But yes, again as others have said, not everything Amicus did worked. Their anthology movies represented their best work (so long as we don't count the appalling TALES THAT WITNESS MADNESS).

Incidentally, I'm sure I saw a trailer the other day for something called THE WICKER TREE. It's supposedly British Lion's official sequel to THE WICKER MAN, and Christopher Lee is said to be reprising his role as the villainous Lord Summerisle.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Forth (John)
Username: John

Registered: 05-2008
Posted From: 82.132.139.221
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 11:51 am:   

Paul, THE WICKER TREE is adapted from Robin Hardy's novel COWBOYS FOR CHRIST, which is a sort of spiritual sequel to THE WICKER MAN. I'm sure I heard that while Christopher Lee has a small role, someone else is playing the Summerisle equivalent.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Paul_finch (Paul_finch)
Username: Paul_finch

Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 92.21.138.176
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 12:18 pm:   

Ahh well. We can but dream.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Carolinec (Carolinec)
Username: Carolinec

Registered: 06-2009
Posted From: 82.38.75.85
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 01:18 pm:   

Yes, here's the IMDB info on The Wicker Tree:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0323808/

As John says, it's based on Hardy's book "Cowboys for Christ". I've read the book. It's a good story, but the book is written as if he's writing a screenplay, although it's meant to be a novel - I imagine it was pretty easy to adapt it to the screenplay!

Christopher Lee was intended as the "Lord Summerisle" character (Sir Lachlan Morrison), but it took so long for Robin Hardy to get funding for this and get it off the ground, that he realised Lee wouldn't be up to the rather strenuous acting which would have been required. So Lee just has a cameo role in the film.

I think it will be worth watching when it comes out (soon, I think?). If you know The Wicker Man (which, I'm sure, we all do) then you think you know what twist is coming at the end, but then there's a further unexpected twist. I'll definitely be taking a look at it myself.

Stevie - great list, as always. Can't really argue with any of the films you've put on there.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Llewellyn Probert (John_l_probert)
Username: John_l_probert

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 213.253.174.81
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 03:37 pm:   

Their anthology movies represented their best work (so long as we don't count the appalling TALES THAT WITNESS MADNESS).

That's ok - it wasn't an Amicus film! It was produced by Norman Priggen for World Film Services, who had made The Creeping Flesh with director Freddie Francis the previous year. The story goes that not realising that Flesh's other producer, Michael Redbourn, was the one responsible for putting that project together, World Film Services allowed Francis and Priggen to do whatever they wanted for their next project which was to...make a bit of a mess, really.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Paul_finch (Paul_finch)
Username: Paul_finch

Registered: 11-2009
Posted From: 92.21.138.176
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 06:58 pm:   

I stand corrected on that one, John. I'm glad to learn that TWM wasn't am Amicus film, because it's totally out of synch with the quality of the other anthologies they presented. I even love THE MONSTER CLUB, though it was very late in the cycle. I think it was unfairly maligned at the time because, by 1980, horror taste - supposedly - had moved into the slasher realm.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hubert (Hubert)
Username: Hubert

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.22.237.21
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 09:32 pm:   

Not by Hammer or Amicus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKvaJiTBHNs

But with Lee and Cushing!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Carolinec (Carolinec)
Username: Carolinec

Registered: 06-2009
Posted From: 82.38.75.85
Posted on Monday, September 27, 2010 - 09:43 pm:   

Oh boy, this thread is making me nostalgic for some great old Brit Horror films. Think I might have to spend some money on DVDs again - my husband will kill me ...

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration