An Exorcist marathon Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

RAMSEY CAMPBELL » Discussion » An Exorcist marathon « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Weber (Weber_gregston)
Username: Weber_gregston

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 212.121.214.10
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 03:08 pm:   

On Sunday I found myself with several hours spare and a box set of all 5 Exorcist films...

I can now officially state that the only two woth watching are the original and Exorcist 3: Legion.

The two prequels are bizarre - especially having both in one box set. I'd love to know the story behind doing an action movie remix of Dominion and calling it Exorcist the Beginning. It's probably a more interesting story than either of the two films told.

One thing all the followups and prequels have in common is that they get things wrong from the original movie. Even Exorcist 3 has a date of 1975 as Fr Karras's year of death.

In the first film we're specifically told that Fr Merrin has perfomed AN exorcism, 10 to 15 years ago (that would make it 1959 ish). It took a month and nearly killed him.

In both prequels the exorcism takes about 5 minutes - regardless of how much power teh demon seems to have - and in Exorcist 2 the heretic, we find out he's been wandering the world seeking out possessed people to exorcise and has performed dozens. Also both prequels are set in the late 40's (Dominion in 47, Beginning in 49)and Fr Merrin is an ex-priest in both.

Exorcist 2 also completely removes any believability in the plot that the original might have had. We have the completely stupid thought transference machines and Richard Burton turning in one of the worst performances of his career. He must have been deperate to pay the mortgage when he took this one on. When he stared straight at the camera and spewed yet another load of pretentious bollocks I nearly choked on my drink. It's really sad that that film has the name Exorcist attached.

I know when I saw the name Renny harlin pop up in the opening credits of Beginning, my heart sank. The only slight modicum of intelligence in the whole of Dominion (and there wasn't much of that) was surgically removed by Harlin's prowess at brainless action sequences and any trace of characterisation was similarly excised. A typical example of this would be the two director's handling of the falshbacks to Nazi occupied Holland. In Schrader's vision, we see the townsfolk being held at gunpoint. In Harlin's we start with a sepia closeup of a cute little girl with her toy dog. Sickening - in all the wrong ways.

My advice - watch the original and number 3 (which isn't flawless - it too suffers from a tacked on exorcism and father Morning should have a much larger role) and forget that the other three exist.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.156.233.19
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 03:15 pm:   

I prefer 2 to 3. I liked 3 but 2 bravely took the story into a new direction, something I think many film makers shy away from. I liked it was quite a spiritual film rather than horror, another rare thing.
I really disliked the Schrader film. I like Schrader but the film was really flat for me.

I got all the Ring films in one box last week - it looks great. Are the sequels any good, does anyone know? I've only seen the first. And Sleeping Bride, the film that comes with them as an extra?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Weber (Weber_gregston)
Username: Weber_gregston

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 212.121.214.10
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 03:34 pm:   

Number 2 is now my official least favourite sequel ever. It's complete smelly granny pants. It might take the story in a new direction, but not one that works, or that is any good in it's execution.

Sorry Tony but I really hate that film.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.149.162.54
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 03:38 pm:   

:-(
I bring you ... Ring 2, the remake sequel! That has to be the dullest, most pointless sequel ever, I think. God it was boring. I could physically see my wasted life dissolving in front of me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Craig (Craig)
Username: Craig

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 99.126.164.88
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 04:23 pm:   

I side with Tony on this one - E2 had something about it.... It was closer to a sci-fi novel; to something you'd read, rather than watch. And I actually admired that. But then I'm a big Boorman fan, and think EXCALIBUR as a fantasy is better than the entire LOTR series, so....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stevie Walsh (Stephenw)
Username: Stephenw

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 194.32.31.1
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 04:24 pm:   

I'm with Weber in his assessment of the first three Exorcist films, and refuse to watch the last two.

As for the Japanese Ringu trilogy... I really like and own all three on DVD. The first is a masterpiece, the second an extremely strong continuance/expansion and the third a surprisingly effective and imaginative prequel. The US remake was shit and I refuse to waste my time on the sequel remake.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.140.191.116
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 04:24 pm:   

There was something almost Cronenbergian about E2. It has the polished air of his later films, too, not the Rabid's or Shivers.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stevie Walsh (Stephenw)
Username: Stephenw

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 194.32.31.1
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 05:12 pm:   

I've watched 'Exorcist II' a few times, trying to love it - as it was John Boorman, a mere five years after 'Deliverance'... but it just doesn't work.

Weber's right, it negates too much of the original, while cashing in on the name, and would have been far better and made more sense as a seperate project entirely. It's a film that infuriates because of what it purported to be and what it clearly wasn't - a cohesive sequel to 'The Exorcist'.

Now, Blatty's own 'Legion' (aka 'Exorcist III') is a different kettle of fish, even if it was flawed (though not fatally) by studio interference, demanding an exorcism for their money. Book and film worked as natural sequels by taking to the next level the specific theme of possession by a demonic entity, and the inference that intelligence can exist outside the physical body.

'Exorcist II' got bogged down in confused psychobabble - as did Boorman's similarly pretentious and infuriating 'Zardoz'. The man just doesn't do sci-fi imho. He more than redeemed himself, genre-wise, with 'Excalibur' though!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Craig (Craig)
Username: Craig

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 99.126.164.88
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 05:44 pm:   

But see, get over that, Stevie! A simple thing like not conflating film with book! Not getting expectations dashed by thinking them the same thing! It's how one can then enjoy STARSHIP TROOPERS and THE FRENCH LIEUTENANT'S WOMAN and SLAUGHTERHOUSE-FIVE and (now that I've read it and see) THE LONG GOODBYE and and and and....
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Protodroid (Protodroid)
Username: Protodroid

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 109.79.8.213
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 05:50 pm:   

"EXCALIBUR as a fantasy is better than the entire LOTR series,"

God, yes. Only severe OCD would force me to watch the last film in the LotR trilogy.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Forth (John)
Username: John

Registered: 05-2008
Posted From: 82.24.1.217
Posted on Tuesday, November 09, 2010 - 09:17 pm:   

I've tried to watch THE EXORCIST II several times and never made it any further than about 40 minutes in. Absolute nonsense. It still staggers me that a such a talented crew and batch of actors could make something so unwatchable.

Blatty's EXORCIST III, though, I love. It took a kicking off the studio, but at times it arguably contains more scares than the original.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patrick Walker (Patrick_walker)
Username: Patrick_walker

Registered: 01-2010
Posted From: 195.59.153.201
Posted on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 07:02 pm:   

You know what, Exorcist III/Legion might well be my favourite horror film ever made, if I'm honest. I'm certainly not saying it's the best, but just the overall tone, the script, cast, direction, pace and, well, just about everything outside of the studio interference are spot on and really do it for me.
As I side note, I believe that in Blatty's original version the only special effect in the entire movie was the old lady scuttling across the ceiling of the hospital ward. It's great stuff.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.176.178.44
Posted on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 08:46 pm:   

Hmmm - not sure about EXCALIBUR, with the comedy-Merlin. Nicol Williamson shouldn't have stooped so low.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Allybird (Allybird)
Username: Allybird

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 88.111.132.33
Posted on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 09:07 pm:   

Don't know if anyone else likes it here, but I caught most of The Exorcism of Emily Rose last night and quite appreciated the non-linear nature of the film, from courtroom scenes going back to what reportedly happened.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.253.77
Posted on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 09:19 pm:   

I liked The Exorcism of Emily Rose, too. I'm a sucker for exorcism films, but I thought this one had some quite chilling moments amid the hysteria.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Allybird (Allybird)
Username: Allybird

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 88.111.132.33
Posted on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 09:48 pm:   

I'm glad you said that. I sat up on my own last night to watch it...suspended my disbelief, and let my mind be disturbed by those chilling moments.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.96.253.77
Posted on Wednesday, November 10, 2010 - 10:52 pm:   

I want to see the German film about the same case - Huw mentioned on here ages ago that it was pretty good and focused more on the factual psychological elements.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tony (Tony)
Username: Tony

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.132.93.28
Posted on Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 10:43 am:   

It was good. Even eerie. I might have liked more ambiguity but it was certainly affecting. Also there was one odd scene where there was a drive to a more modern city in which the girl lived, and I had the strange feeling she was leaving her time. I don't think it was intended though (I love things like that).
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Frank (Frank)
Username: Frank

Registered: 09-2008
Posted From: 85.222.86.21
Posted on Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 11:12 am:   

The documentary about the actual case on which Blatty's 'The Exorcist' was based, was extremely unnerving. If you ever get the chance, check it out.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Zed (Gary_mc)
Username: Gary_mc

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 195.166.117.210
Posted on Thursday, November 11, 2010 - 11:31 am:   

Seen it. Enjoyed it.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration