A Chemistry of Genres Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

RAMSEY CAMPBELL » Discussion » A Chemistry of Genres « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rhysaurus (Rhysaurus)
Username: Rhysaurus

Registered: 01-2010
Posted From: 212.219.233.223
Posted on Friday, May 27, 2011 - 03:30 pm:   

I have been wondering for a long while whether a precise chemistry of genres is possible.

For example, mackinawite is an iron nickel sulfide mineral with the following formula: (Fe,Ni)1 + xS. Small amounts are pyrophoric: they spontaneously combust in air...

What might happen if a writer blends (for instance) fantasy with realism with metafiction in comparable amounts in an analogous formula? Will there be some sort of story-detonation (metaphorical of course)?

This idea fascinates me. I'm not talking about simple 'blind' fusions (Young Frankenstein blended horror with comedy). I'm talking about a PRECISE chemistry of genres...

Any thoughts?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Des (Des)
Username: Des

Registered: 09-2010
Posted From: 81.155.107.43
Posted on Friday, May 27, 2011 - 05:18 pm:   

Or alchemy?

I think I've been trying to do this. Not vocalised it yet, though. Joe Meek's Telstar is better without voices.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stephen Theaker (Stephen_theaker)
Username: Stephen_theaker

Registered: 12-2009
Posted From: 92.232.184.206
Posted on Friday, May 27, 2011 - 06:04 pm:   

You mean like Jason X, Rhys?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ramsey Campbell (Ramsey)
Username: Ramsey

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 92.8.19.207
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 10:45 am:   

I've no idea, Rhys - my approach to writing is too intuitive, I think.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gary Fry (Gary_fry)
Username: Gary_fry

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.31.170.126
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 11:09 am:   

>>>Joe Meek's Telstar is better without voices.

Des, the guy who lives in the apartment above me was a member of The Tornadoes. Ray Randall, he's called. He's a cunt.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Des (Des)
Username: Des

Registered: 09-2010
Posted From: 81.155.107.43
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 11:52 am:   

Good job he didn't sing on it then with his voice.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gary Fry (Gary_fry)
Username: Gary_fry

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.31.170.126
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 11:53 am:   

His voice? As opposed to what?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Des (Des)
Username: Des

Registered: 09-2010
Posted From: 81.155.107.43
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 11:54 am:   

And indeed he wasn't yet in the group when they did Telstar, according to Wikipedia.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rhysaurus (Rhysaurus)
Username: Rhysaurus

Registered: 01-2010
Posted From: 212.219.233.223
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 11:57 am:   

Wasn't Heinz in the Tornadoes too?

He had 57 isotopes apparently, Heinz did. (Subtly returning the conversation to chemistry...)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Des (Des)
Username: Des

Registered: 09-2010
Posted From: 81.155.107.43
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 11:59 am:   

Yes, Heinz was in the group when they did Telstar, and I think RR replaced him.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Rhysaurus (Rhysaurus)
Username: Rhysaurus

Registered: 01-2010
Posted From: 212.219.233.223
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 12:04 pm:   

Beanz Meanz Heinz... Telestar means geostationary communication possibilities...

Coincidence? I think not.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Carolinec (Carolinec)
Username: Carolinec

Registered: 06-2009
Posted From: 92.232.199.129
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 08:42 pm:   

>>my approach to writing is too intuitive, I think.<<

That would sum it up for me from a reader's perspective (rather than a writer's perspective). For me, there's a "magic" (chemistry? alchemy?) which occurs when what the writer has put onto paper somehow creates a "wow" reaction in the reader's imagination/mind. That's chemistry (or alchemy?) in writing as far as I'm concerned. Put the writer and the reader together and see what kind of reaction you get ...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Des (Des)
Username: Des

Registered: 09-2010
Posted From: 81.155.107.43
Posted on Saturday, May 28, 2011 - 08:46 pm:   

Yes, Caroline, I think you're right - the chemistry is between reader and writer in synergy rather than between seedbeds of meticulously measured elements within the author alone.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration