Hate speech Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

RAMSEY CAMPBELL » Discussion » Hate speech « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ramsey Campbell (Ramsey)
Username: Ramsey

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 92.8.21.87
Posted on Sunday, April 15, 2012 - 03:25 pm:   

Interesting.

http://www.indexoncensorship.org/2012/04/words-and-deeds/
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel (Joel)
Username: Joel

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 2.24.39.119
Posted on Sunday, April 15, 2012 - 10:48 pm:   

Most interesting, yes. Especially as it bases its argument on historical analysis rather than an abstract 'freedom of speech' principle. I agree that basing the banning of 'hate speech' on a speculative prediction of its effects is hard to justify. Really 'hate speech' has to be assessed in real time as a form of abuse and/or libel. People have a right not to be defamed in a public context, and a right to live free from abuse, and that is the context in which 'hate speech' should be assessed. Not all kinds of mockery, satire, criticism etc are 'hate speech' and, while I think there are certain kinds of abuse and libel that people should not have to suffer, the distinction between acceptable and unacceptable verbal attacks requires careful thought and public debate. People have a right to live their lives without hostile and/or dishonest abuse, but they do not have an automatic right to silence mockery or criticism. There's no simple formula for the distinction.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Christopher Overend (Chris_overend)
Username: Chris_overend

Registered: 03-2012
Posted From: 78.148.200.234
Posted on Sunday, April 15, 2012 - 11:52 pm:   

Eloquent, Joel.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stevie Walsh (Stephenw)
Username: Stephenw

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 82.18.174.156
Posted on Monday, April 16, 2012 - 08:16 am:   

Given any statement of criticism it's all a matter of judging the tone of the "attack" with its content, innit. Exaggeration for comic effect is fine (Jeffrey Archer deserves to be shot for his crimes against fiction) but spreading misinformation to instil fear and hatred (the Protocols of the Elders of Zion) is criminal.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stevie Walsh (Stephenw)
Username: Stephenw

Registered: 03-2009
Posted From: 194.32.31.1
Posted on Monday, April 16, 2012 - 12:25 pm:   

As an adjunct to this discussion I was late for work this morning due to getting hopelessly involved with the televised opening of the Anders Breivik trial in Norway.

The man was allowed to make a statement admitting his actions but denying any criminal responsibility due to his being a soldier in the war against multiculturalism. For him, so he professed, this was a statement of fact not hatred and therefore he could not be charged with any crime.

What followed was over an hour of this poor woman within the courtroom having to read out every detail of all 77 deaths he was responsible for, involving frequent stops to compose herself with a drink of water and an uncomprehending upward glance at the man responsible. He never once raised his head and even had to shake himself out of a doze at one stage.

What struck me, though, was the sheer humanity with which this individual was treated and the professionalism of all the courtroom staff, with nothing more than looks of heartfelt sympathy to the woman reading his litany of death to reveal their own unspoken feelings.

The stiff procedures of the courtroom in the face of such a monstrous crime may seem cold at first glance but watched right through with all subtleties noticed one realises that's the heart of humanity right there. Intelligence, respect, self-control in the face of the unthinkable and the curtailing of all our base selfish instincts to strike out against that which harms us.

By comparison Breivik appeared nothing more than a superficial coward living behind a thin curtain of barely sustained arrogance. God help all the relatives of the bereaved and everyone touched by this man's ego.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ramsey Campbell (Ramsey)
Username: Ramsey

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 92.8.27.69
Posted on Monday, April 16, 2012 - 12:51 pm:   

I agree, Stevie. I felt very much the same about the Moat man.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Huw (Huw)
Username: Huw

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 61.216.44.17
Posted on Monday, April 16, 2012 - 02:33 pm:   

Well said, Stevie. I followed this on the news today and felt the same way about it.

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration