Author |
Message |
Mark_lynch (Mark_lynch) Username: Mark_lynch
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.171.129.72
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:04 pm: | |
Google have now scanned a million or so books, many still copyright protected. They're making them available online shortly. Today is the final day for authors and copyright holders to 'opt out' of the online publication thingy. Yes, you heard me. You've to opt out. They are claiming legally they're in the right by making you opt out rather than sign up for it. So, over to Joel... |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:12 pm: | |
I so don't understand how they can do this... Joel will be along unless he has destroyed the screen. |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.37.199.45
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:16 pm: | |
Where do they live? There's only one solution and that is immediate and devastating violence. This is theft of people's property and their livelihood. SMASH THESE VILLAINS NOW. My only consolation is that they won't bother to steal my work because there won't be any profit in it. Did you know that the UK's Conservative Party has strong links with Google, which is why the Tories are now promising to privatise the electronic patient record system? I wonder who'll be first in the queue for the franchise on that nice little earner? |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.37.199.45
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:23 pm: | |
We need to hear from one of the writers who visits this board and whose livelihood is being destroyed by Google. It's all very well me ranting, but it's not my survival that's at stake. |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.37.199.45
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:25 pm: | |
The Conservative Party thing is true by the way, not just a bullshit online rumour. I got it from the British Medical Journal. |
Zed (Gary_mc) Username: Gary_mc
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 213.219.8.243
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:26 pm: | |
Words fail me. I'm off to murder Google shareholders. the only way to avoid this is for each individual to contact me and opt out of this killing spree. |
Gary Fry (Gary_fry)
Username: Gary_fry
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.26.90.161
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:30 pm: | |
That's your next story, mate . . . I look forward to reading it for free online. |
Zed (Gary_mc) Username: Gary_mc
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 213.219.8.243
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:38 pm: | |
|
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.37.199.45
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:39 pm: | |
They're not content to see bookshops being shut down and publishers go out of business at a devastating rate, they have to stand there with petrol cans and matches shouting 'Burn faster.' FUCK THE INTERNET. |
Gary Fry (Gary_fry)
Username: Gary_fry
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.26.90.161
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:48 pm: | |
Look at the surname of Google's founder: you couldn't make it up, could you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Page |
Mark_lynch (Mark_lynch) Username: Mark_lynch
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.171.129.68
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 02:58 pm: | |
Just seen Nick Harkaway (John le Carre's writer son) on BBC News 24 saying he's opted out but does wonder if he's made a mistake. Presumably, somehow, there is author payment involved somewhere. |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 03:02 pm: | |
Here is something...I haven't read all of it yet. http://www.nickharkaway.com/2009/09/google-crunch-time/ |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 03:15 pm: | |
He's right. The whole idea is awful and to put so much in the hands of one company...legislation is not involved etc. As he says - the only positive note is that Sony and Google could screw Amazon a little....tempting. |
Michael_kelly (Michael_kelly) Username: Michael_kelly
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 174.88.169.155
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 03:26 pm: | |
I simply hate the idea that they have taken books, digitized them, (without consent, at first, by the way), in effect stealing the works to commercialize on them, forcing authors and publishers to "opt-in" or "opt-out." The monies will be nominal, I'm sure. Goddam thieves! I've opted out, needless to say. I'd opt out on principle, no matter the money involved. Go here to opt out, if you're so inclined: http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/r/enter_opt_out |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.37.199.45
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 03:38 pm: | |
Thanks, Mike. |
Carolinec (Carolinec) Username: Carolinec
Registered: 06-2009 Posted From: 82.38.75.85
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 03:44 pm: | |
It can't be legal for Google to do this without buying the rights from authors first, surely? So I don't see how this opt-out thing works. I would have thought they'd be legally obliged to ask authors first whether they were happy for their work to be digitised like this. But maybe I'm wrong? I hope not - I'd like to see some big name author take Google to court (and win!) on this. |
Simon Bestwick (Simon_b) Username: Simon_b
Registered: 10-2008 Posted From: 194.75.171.106
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 04:11 pm: | |
Opted out. Fuck the bastards. |
Craig (Craig) Username: Craig
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 75.4.255.50
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 04:30 pm: | |
This whole thing is confusing to me. Are the books going to be offered for free?... Is it to simply store them for reasons of preservation?.. What seems to (? - I can't quite grasp the nature of this project) enrage ME, is the utter monopolistic hypocrisy of the whole thing: If I wanted to go out tomorrow, and "preserve" all the crumbling lost ghost literature in my OWN database and call it Ghostbooks.com, say, I COULDN'T?! Because only google can do whatever it wants, and I can't do what I want? And lawyers would sue me if I tried?... Maybe I'm all mixed-up about the basics of this, but it also seems to be the first tentative toe-dipping step into the lake of control of the internet.... |
Hubert (Hubert) Username: Hubert
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 78.21.233.167
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 05:50 pm: | |
Perhaps the small(er) press is the last vestige of a dying medium. How's about that for a thought, friends and neighbours? |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 217.37.199.45
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 06:00 pm: | |
Not so much dying as being viciously and systematically wiped out through the destruction of its habitat and means of survival.
|
Des (Des)
Username: Des
Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 86.168.160.222
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 06:10 pm: | |
I shall continue publishing Nemonymous books as real books, come what may. And posting my own stuff on the internet. |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Friday, September 04, 2009 - 06:37 pm: | |
Dying - I just remember checking how much discount was demanded on small press books when my publisher was in hospital. Gardners/Amazon 57%? - can't rem now. Terrible - nothing for anyone except Amazon. |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 01:49 pm: | |
Still looking at it. http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14363287 Says you can opt out in the future too. |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 02:20 pm: | |
I tried looking up The Modern Weird Tale by Joshi. 20 or so pages in there with the permission of the publisher. Then H.P.Lovecraft's Book of the Supernatural by S.Jones and Randy Becker - quite a lot online (presumably with permission) and it gives a side bar where you can get copies and the cost. Overviews for Stephen King - no previews. Same for Joe Lansdale. |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 02:37 pm: | |
Google says of the former - extract by permission of McFarland, the publisher - but the latter just says published by Pegasus Books and copyright next to it. |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 91.110.216.199
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 05:26 pm: | |
If you should stumble across any of my work online (apart from a story on wwww.pulpnet.com, which they paid me for and have with my blessing), please let me know where you found it and, if possible, where the publisher lives. Said address will henceforth be known as 'where they found some unidentifiable remains'. |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 91.110.190.133
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 05:36 pm: | |
Actually the wonderful Forbidden Fruit website has a story of mine too. I sent it to them. That was before I realised that the Internet is a latrine. I just thought it was a lot of cubicles and you could write on the walls. I often like people's nice little websites and e-zines, be they fit or lame. They're the corner shops of the online economy. I hate corporate online capitalism and its mechanical rape and exploitation, allied to the destruction of book publishing and bookselling. |
Craig (Craig) Username: Craig
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 75.5.7.186
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 07:06 pm: | |
Is it going to be like bit-torrent sites, you can rapidly download whole libraries of books?... It'll never catch on, if so, people want to read hard-copies, not screens, will never change. Does anyone have a problem with the clear copyright violation of bit-torrent sites?... There are, for example, rare movies on these sites, that one will NEVER get to see, unless one was, let's say... "morally-flexible" enough, to download them. A movie sitting in the studio vaults... no intention of ever releasing it back to the public... you don't want to re-sell it, you just want to view it... what's wrong with downloading and seeing it?... |
Gcw (Gcw) Username: Gcw
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.150.109.19
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 10:31 pm: | |
Simple question. Surely it is illegal to copy a copyrighted text? gcw |
Allybird (Allybird) Username: Allybird
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 80.47.88.46
| Posted on Sunday, September 06, 2009 - 11:46 pm: | |
Some companies seem to have agreed to a partnership with google. Other entries - for example The Duma Key show a couple of word snippet - The Shining a sentence overview. Nothing from the scripts. |
Craig (Craig) Username: Craig
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 75.5.8.167
| Posted on Monday, September 07, 2009 - 02:33 am: | |
There's a few sites, easy to find, that make downloading movies from youtube as easy as pie, and totally free - you can put them on an iPod and watch it at your own leisure. I see nothing wrong with this... I have no intention of doing anything except watching these on a TV or the iPod... it's no different than me sitting in front of a computer watching them.... I found the hard-to-find Hal Ashby flick THE LANDLORD there on youtube, complete (in parts)... and Fritz Lang's SECRETS BEYOND THE DOOR... movies I've been wanting to see for a while... nothing wrong in a little creative maneuvering, I say.... |