| Author | Message | ||
     Simon Strantzas (Nomis) Username: Nomis Registered: 05-2008 Posted From: 99.225.111.224 |
These look absolutely sweet! http://thepenguinblog.typepad.com/the_penguin_blog/2008/05/covering-bond.html | ||
| Mick Curtis (Mick) Username: Mick Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.163.48.60 |
Far out! | ||
| Matthew_fell (Matthew_fell) Username: Matthew_fell Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 216.232.189.45 |
Ah, a new bimbo design. A far cry from the talent of Richard Chopping, whose Bond covers bore comparison with the work of Tom Adams on the Agatha Christie paperbacks in the 60s/70s. The new designs are supposed to be attractive? Wish I had the old David Jacobs' hooter from Juke Box Jury. I definitely vote it a 'Miss'. Christopher | ||
| Stu (Stu) Username: Stu Registered: 04-2008 Posted From: 86.29.99.173 |
They seem to be aiming for the vibe of the Robert McGinnis film posters from the 60s. But concentrating on the girls rather than Bond. http://www.jamesbondmm.co.uk/bond-posters/thunderball-posters.php?id=003 | ||
| Zed (Gary_mc) Username: Gary_mc Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 81.96.249.146 |
Well, I like 'em! | ||
| Craig (Craig) Username: Craig Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 75.16.84.40 |
They shoulda turned around that last chick, and scooted the tattoo down. ... meaning it would have been the only one to sell - my point being, I hate these new covers.... |