Question for Ramsey or collectors of RC Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

RAMSEY CAMPBELL » Discussion » Question for Ramsey or collectors of RC « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 216.54.1.35
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 03:44 am:   

I won a signed, slipcased, 200-copy limited edition of Ramsey Campbell's The Darkest Part of the Woods on eBay a couple weeks ago. This is the true first edition of the novel. When it arrived today, I noticed the title on the dustjacket spine is incorrectly printed as The Darkest Part of The Wods. I'm sure this printer's boo-boo was discovered early in the run and then corrected. But this mistake would constitute the first state of the first printing of the first edition. Have I lost anyone? More important, does anyone know how rare this WODS version is? Or were all 200 copies misprinted?

Thanks.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Craig (Craig)
Username: Craig

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 67.116.103.241
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 04:15 am:   

If you do decide to sell, Tom, just make sure you get a good price for it - don't blow your Wods.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 68.10.197.98
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 06:17 am:   

Ha! Good one!
Actually, I don't want to sell it. I'm just curious how many other copies there are. (We book collectors love the idea having something no one else has--in this case a whole Wod of it)!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.159.137.236
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 07:58 am:   

I've heard about this before, I'm sure - maybe it was Ramsey who mentioned it. Or perhaps Andy Richards... I have one of the 500 numbered copies and it's printed ok on that.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.159.137.236
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:01 am:   

Just found an interview with Pete Crowther where he's asked about the early days of PS, and says summat about "But we have had a couple of splendid typos creep into our books -- like Ramsey's The Darkest Part of the Woods, which we put out with a cover-spine saying The Darkest Part of the Wods!"

http://www.sfsite.com/columns/jeff259.htm
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.159.137.236
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:03 am:   

Oh, and a comment here by a seller - check title number 11:-

http://www.tomfolio.com/SearchAuthorTitle.asp?Aut=Ramsey_Campbell
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hubert (Hubert)
Username: Hubert

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.22.229.240
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:59 am:   

I have a signed copy of DARK FEASTS that is full of printing errors. Pages 107 through 110 are loosely tucked into the book (they form a single big leaf with 107-110 on one side and 108-109 on the other). "The Ferries" ends cryptically with the message 'End of File: 170AUP ... on Dir:70'. I've always wondered about this. Are all copies like that?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Lincoln_brown (Lincoln_brown)
Username: Lincoln_brown

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 58.168.173.24
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 10:00 am:   

'Dark Feasts', with the "End of File..." message is a true first edition, first printing. Book was recalled and re-issued without the mistake - first edition, second printing.

I was sure that the printing error on the spine of 'Darkest Part...' was only to be found on the 500 copy limited edition (no slipcase). My ltd/slipcased edition has 'Woods' spelt correctly. There was a copy for sale on e-bay recently, with the error and it was the ltd. to 500 edition.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Hubert (Hubert)
Username: Hubert

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 78.22.229.240
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 10:57 am:   

Thanks, Lincoln.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel (Joel)
Username: Joel

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.149.134.59
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 01:18 pm:   

I have both the errant DARK FEASTS (which I purchased before those copies were recalled) and the errant (non-slipcased) THE DARKEST PART OF THE WOODS. In my copy of the latter, the text is missing from the last page. Tom, that may be the case with your copy also: if the last chapter ends rather abruptly at the bottom of the last right-hand page, the text on the final page is missing. Check any other edition to compare.

The errant DARK FEASTS is badly corrupted, with a great many typos – evidently an uncorrected proof. Do not trust any version within that 'edition'!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Ramsey Campbell (Ramsey)
Username: Ramsey

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 195.93.21.74
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 02:10 pm:   

Just to add to the bibliographical fun: I dedicated The Grin of the Dark to Pete and Nicky Crowther "who saved me from the wods". Alas, in the Tor edition someone has revised that to read "woods"...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel (Joel)
Username: Joel

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.149.134.59
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 02:18 pm:   

Spare a thought for the publishing minion who had to proof-read FINNEGANS WAKE.

And for the hapless editor who put MALONE DIES on the cover of a Samuel Beckett novel. Those words were not meant to be the title: they were the synopsis.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 68.10.197.98
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 05:02 pm:   

Thanks to everyone for the info. Apparently, what I have is #166 of the the 500-copy edition---but someone has added a slipcase. The 200-copy edition has 2 plates, which are missing from my copy. The signature/limitation sheet is no help, as it states both editions. So, I guess one determines the edition by the presence/absence of the 2 illustrations (and the slipcase, which is a bit more unreliable, since it seems to get around).

Joel, the text doesn't seem to be cut short. (So there are at least 2 errant versions).

Ramsey, what wod you do without intelligent copy editors?

Now, I know this is going to sound bad, especially coming from another (very small) publisher, but (speaking as a collector) I expected a much sturdier binding on a book limited to 500 copies. This one looks like it could fall apart with one careless reading.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel (Joel)
Username: Joel

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 86.149.134.59
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 05:22 pm:   

PS Publishing had some production difficulties in the early days, and the physical properties of their novels from that time are less than ideal. Recent books from them have shown a quantum leap in terms of production values, in terms of binding, typesetting and even paper, along with a significant drop in price. You can't say fairer than that.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 68.10.197.98
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 05:43 pm:   

Yes, PS has improved tremendously in both physical production and book design, and the books continue to be a great value. I just pulled down my copy of Zoran Zivkovik's Impossible Stories, and it's quite nice.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Des (Des)
Username: Des

Registered: 06-2008
Posted From: 86.163.170.232
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 06:03 pm:   

WOD is my favourite story by Robert Aickman.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gcw (Gcw)
Username: Gcw

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.156.43.97
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 09:58 pm:   

"Just to add to the bibliographical fun: I dedicated The Grin of the Dark to Pete and Nicky Crowther "who saved me from the wods". Alas, in the Tor edition someone has revised that to read "woods"..."

Ha! - excellent!

My first copy of Darkest Part Of The Woods actually fell to pieces while i was reading it.

I emailed Pete Crowther, who earned my respected by being a complete gentleman and replacing the book, plus sending me a free copy of a Mark Morris for the trouble.

PS's print quality is superb these days I must say, - second to none.

gcw
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Gcw (Gcw)
Username: Gcw

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 81.156.43.97
Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 09:59 pm:   

"I emailed Pete Crowther, who earned my respected by being a complete gentleman and replacing the book, plus sending me a free copy of a Mark Morris for the trouble."

A book that is, I don't think Mark Morris has been cloned yet!

gcw
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Joel (Joel)
Username: Joel

Registered: 03-2008
Posted From: 91.108.59.149
Posted on Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 12:23 am:   

Pity. (Sigh.)

Add Your Message Here
Post:
Bold text Italics Underline Create a hyperlink Insert a clipart image

Username: Posting Information:
This is a private posting area. Only registered users and moderators may post messages here.
Password:
Options: Enable HTML code in message
Automatically activate URLs in message
Action:

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration