Author |
Message |
Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 216.54.1.35
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 03:44 am: | |
I won a signed, slipcased, 200-copy limited edition of Ramsey Campbell's The Darkest Part of the Woods on eBay a couple weeks ago. This is the true first edition of the novel. When it arrived today, I noticed the title on the dustjacket spine is incorrectly printed as The Darkest Part of The Wods. I'm sure this printer's boo-boo was discovered early in the run and then corrected. But this mistake would constitute the first state of the first printing of the first edition. Have I lost anyone? More important, does anyone know how rare this WODS version is? Or were all 200 copies misprinted? Thanks. |
Craig (Craig) Username: Craig
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 67.116.103.241
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 04:15 am: | |
If you do decide to sell, Tom, just make sure you get a good price for it - don't blow your Wods. |
Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 68.10.197.98
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 06:17 am: | |
Ha! Good one! Actually, I don't want to sell it. I'm just curious how many other copies there are. (We book collectors love the idea having something no one else has--in this case a whole Wod of it)! |
Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.159.137.236
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 07:58 am: | |
I've heard about this before, I'm sure - maybe it was Ramsey who mentioned it. Or perhaps Andy Richards... I have one of the 500 numbered copies and it's printed ok on that. |
Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.159.137.236
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:01 am: | |
Just found an interview with Pete Crowther where he's asked about the early days of PS, and says summat about "But we have had a couple of splendid typos creep into our books -- like Ramsey's The Darkest Part of the Woods, which we put out with a cover-spine saying The Darkest Part of the Wods!" http://www.sfsite.com/columns/jeff259.htm |
Mick Curtis (Mick)
Username: Mick
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.159.137.236
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:03 am: | |
Oh, and a comment here by a seller - check title number 11:- http://www.tomfolio.com/SearchAuthorTitle.asp?Aut=Ramsey_Campbell |
Hubert (Hubert) Username: Hubert
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 78.22.229.240
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:59 am: | |
I have a signed copy of DARK FEASTS that is full of printing errors. Pages 107 through 110 are loosely tucked into the book (they form a single big leaf with 107-110 on one side and 108-109 on the other). "The Ferries" ends cryptically with the message 'End of File: 170AUP ... on Dir:70'. I've always wondered about this. Are all copies like that? |
Lincoln_brown (Lincoln_brown) Username: Lincoln_brown
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 58.168.173.24
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 10:00 am: | |
'Dark Feasts', with the "End of File..." message is a true first edition, first printing. Book was recalled and re-issued without the mistake - first edition, second printing. I was sure that the printing error on the spine of 'Darkest Part...' was only to be found on the 500 copy limited edition (no slipcase). My ltd/slipcased edition has 'Woods' spelt correctly. There was a copy for sale on e-bay recently, with the error and it was the ltd. to 500 edition. |
Hubert (Hubert) Username: Hubert
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 78.22.229.240
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 10:57 am: | |
Thanks, Lincoln. |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.149.134.59
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 01:18 pm: | |
I have both the errant DARK FEASTS (which I purchased before those copies were recalled) and the errant (non-slipcased) THE DARKEST PART OF THE WOODS. In my copy of the latter, the text is missing from the last page. Tom, that may be the case with your copy also: if the last chapter ends rather abruptly at the bottom of the last right-hand page, the text on the final page is missing. Check any other edition to compare. The errant DARK FEASTS is badly corrupted, with a great many typos – evidently an uncorrected proof. Do not trust any version within that 'edition'! |
Ramsey Campbell (Ramsey) Username: Ramsey
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 195.93.21.74
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 02:10 pm: | |
Just to add to the bibliographical fun: I dedicated The Grin of the Dark to Pete and Nicky Crowther "who saved me from the wods". Alas, in the Tor edition someone has revised that to read "woods"... |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.149.134.59
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 02:18 pm: | |
Spare a thought for the publishing minion who had to proof-read FINNEGANS WAKE. And for the hapless editor who put MALONE DIES on the cover of a Samuel Beckett novel. Those words were not meant to be the title: they were the synopsis. |
Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 68.10.197.98
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 05:02 pm: | |
Thanks to everyone for the info. Apparently, what I have is #166 of the the 500-copy edition---but someone has added a slipcase. The 200-copy edition has 2 plates, which are missing from my copy. The signature/limitation sheet is no help, as it states both editions. So, I guess one determines the edition by the presence/absence of the 2 illustrations (and the slipcase, which is a bit more unreliable, since it seems to get around). Joel, the text doesn't seem to be cut short. (So there are at least 2 errant versions). Ramsey, what wod you do without intelligent copy editors? Now, I know this is going to sound bad, especially coming from another (very small) publisher, but (speaking as a collector) I expected a much sturdier binding on a book limited to 500 copies. This one looks like it could fall apart with one careless reading. |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 86.149.134.59
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 05:22 pm: | |
PS Publishing had some production difficulties in the early days, and the physical properties of their novels from that time are less than ideal. Recent books from them have shown a quantum leap in terms of production values, in terms of binding, typesetting and even paper, along with a significant drop in price. You can't say fairer than that. |
Tom English (Deadletterpress)
Username: Deadletterpress
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 68.10.197.98
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 05:43 pm: | |
Yes, PS has improved tremendously in both physical production and book design, and the books continue to be a great value. I just pulled down my copy of Zoran Zivkovik's Impossible Stories, and it's quite nice. |
Des (Des)
Username: Des
Registered: 06-2008 Posted From: 86.163.170.232
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 06:03 pm: | |
WOD is my favourite story by Robert Aickman. |
Gcw (Gcw) Username: Gcw
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 81.156.43.97
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 09:58 pm: | |
"Just to add to the bibliographical fun: I dedicated The Grin of the Dark to Pete and Nicky Crowther "who saved me from the wods". Alas, in the Tor edition someone has revised that to read "woods"..." Ha! - excellent! My first copy of Darkest Part Of The Woods actually fell to pieces while i was reading it. I emailed Pete Crowther, who earned my respected by being a complete gentleman and replacing the book, plus sending me a free copy of a Mark Morris for the trouble. PS's print quality is superb these days I must say, - second to none. gcw |
Gcw (Gcw) Username: Gcw
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 81.156.43.97
| Posted on Friday, July 25, 2008 - 09:59 pm: | |
"I emailed Pete Crowther, who earned my respected by being a complete gentleman and replacing the book, plus sending me a free copy of a Mark Morris for the trouble." A book that is, I don't think Mark Morris has been cloned yet! gcw |
Joel (Joel) Username: Joel
Registered: 03-2008 Posted From: 91.108.59.149
| Posted on Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 12:23 am: | |
Pity. (Sigh.) |